Up and Running Again

For a period of time some additions and updates will be made on the Voices blog. Your input is welcome if you would like to add or update information about yourself or about our Class of '63 friends. You can contact me, Nicki Wilcoxson, on Facebook by sending a message to me there. Your contributions are welcomed. January 17, 2012

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

A Box of Chocolates ... Tiger, Tiger ... and Caveat Sender....

The Looking Glass
by Jennifer Johnston

William Blake's original plate for The Tyger (ca. 1794)

I've recently had occasion to reflect that my e-mail Inbox is like Forrest Gump's box of chocolates: You never know what you're gonna get....

I actually managed some time ago to block bogus Nigerian Princes and their dubious get-rich-quick schemes. I've kept a flood of unwanted ads and pitches for products of questionable efficacy from my "main" Inbox by having an "alternate" e-mail account that I use anytime I must register to enter a site of interest. BTW ... it works like a charm!!! That "alternate" e-address gets hundreds of spam-mails over the course of just a day or two ... while my real Inbox remains reasonably pristine and available for the "important" stuff (at least to me) of staying in touch with friends, sending/receiving birthday wishes, planning get-togethers and other (ideally lovely) things.

Unfortunately, in the "you never know what you're gonna get" category, I sometimes (once would be too often) get idiotic, inane, rabble-rousing and/or nasty e-mails, written (I imagine) by a band of drooling neo-Neanderthal cretins in a moss-covered cave without sanitary facilities (although this may be broadly unfair to Neanderthals in general) ... e-mails that are then mindlessly (or maliciously) passed on by some of those with whom I normally exchange pleasantries, despite my repeated requests to stop sending me such trash.

The latest "poison mouse" missive came yesterday from someone I have reconnected with in the last few years, though we have never been close friends. The e-mail (which also purported to have been "verified by Snopes" ... a half-truth at best) told the inflammatory story of how Tiger Woods was supposedly invited to speak at President Obama's inauguration, but that those who invited Tiger were stunned (I am put in mind of shocked! shocked!) when Woods "did not deliver the message [the inviters] had expected." The e-mail also said that the media swept this alleged affront to Tiger (and his message about god and military service) "under the rug" and went on to imply that "a certain element" (liberals ... ooooh, scary!!!) were "ticked off" (I have used a euphemism here) at Tiger because of what he said.

Balderdash!!! Let's shed some truth and light on this warped "story." Tiger was NOT invited to speak at the inauguration of President Obama. He was invited to be one of several performers/personages to appear at the "We are One" pre-inaugural special which appeared on HBO. As an HBO subscriber, I watched the entire "We Are One" presentation ... actually recorded it and watched it again because it was so incredibly moving and uplifting ... and I am here to tell you that Tiger DID appear and deliver the speech quoted in the e-mail, as had been planned for him to do.

Tiger's portion of the program was specifically and purposefully dedicated to the Armed Services of the United States of America ... which appeared in the planned program of the event. Tiger did not slyly and/or patriotically "slip something by" his "inviters" or then President-Elect Obama, as this ridiculous e-mail implies. Further, President-Elect Obama, sitting just a few feet away from the stage, smiled and nodded as Tiger spoke, joined the applause at the end of the presentation, and then walked onstage and spoke with and shook the hands of those who had appeared, including Tiger.

Though the e-mail accurately quoted Tiger's remarks, it becomes a lie because it distorts the truth about the incident, Tiger's participation and purpose, and Obama's and the media's (oooh, scary again!!!) actions. Nothing about Tiger's remarks was "swept under the rug" ... by anyone. His speech (and the participation of the other people involved) did not receive wide media distribution because HBO decreed that only HBO subscribers, or those willing to pay for viewing the special, would have access to the entire pre-inaugural program. (Obama's speech was carried by the major news networks, the distinction being that it was labeled as "news" and not "entertainment.") I am personally disappointed that the special was not available on the major networks, because it was beautiful, moving and (again) uplifting. Unfortunately, capitalism and the profit motive reared their hydra-heads again ... and that trumps uplift nearly every time....



Tiger Woods

Tiger's speech did indeed praise the U.S. military, mentioning of course his own father's military service, and spoke of the sacrifices military personnel and their families make in the cause of freedom and defense of our nation. However, after quoting Tiger's remarks, whoever originated this e-mail went totally off the rails, frothing at the mouth and making all sorts of ridiculous claims, such as:

  • Liberals have been mad at Tiger for decades for not joining their "ranks;"
  • Tiger "didn't want to be there" (I didn't see a gun to his head when I watched "We Are One" ... and Tiger himself has said that it was a great honor for him to take part in the celebration);
  • Tiger specifically and intentionally did not mention Obama once and spoke instead of the military (well yes ... but not everyone who participated in the special did mention Obama directly ... and despite the e-mail's implications, the presentation was intended not as obeisance to Obama, but as a celebration and tribute to our country, to our "one nation, indivisible"); and
  • Tiger was "his own man" and said what he wanted to anyway, knowing that "his love for America and appreciation for our military men and women would anger them [guess who?] further."

Oh gag me with a spoon.... Unlike the innuendo of the e-mail, it should be noted again that these were remarks that Tiger (who is considered apolitical by himself and others) planned to deliver ... that were part of the program presented ... and in no way did Tiger venture bravely off the reservation like some ornery maverick to gore Obama and/or liberals. This rabid, scurrilous, distorted (and bottom-line lying) attempt to rile people up and demonize liberals is just beyond the pale, is contemptible, and has no place in a reasonable, civilized society.

  • News Flash: Many liberals (and I proudly wear the label, even ... especially ... when "bleeding heart" is appended to it) are just as patriotic, just as appreciative of our great country, just as supportive of our military, as the most ramrod-straight, crew-cut conservative. Yes, there are far-left fringe morons with whom I don't agree ... just as there are far-right looney 'toons (like whoever originated this e-mail) who are seriously damaging our nation and our sense of community by passing around lies and incendiary exhortations to anger, pandering to the lowest common denominator. Most of the people in this country fall somewhere in the center politically ... and recent polls have shown that more now identify as slightly left of center than right ... which IMHO is a very good thing.

The e-mail goes on to note approvingly that after his speech, Tiger went on to introduce the Naval Academy Glee Club. Based on the implications of the e-mail, some might assume that Tiger had, on his own initiative, brought the Naval Academy singers to the celebration and wrangled them himself into the program despite great personal peril ... just to thwart liberals and Obama. Somebody needs to get a serious grip here....

And speaking seriously ... this is just one (the most recent and one of the more laughable) of such e-mails that I've received recently ... and frankly, I am afraid that some of the more gullible and less informed of our citizens will once again be panicked into acting against their own interests. There is a great hue and cry right now over proposed health care reform (which hopefully will include universal health care for every citizen of this nation, which is long overdue). However, those who would keep this country following the same failed policies of the past several years are vigorously raising the old shibboleths of Socialism ... Communism ... other "isms" which we were taught from the time we were small to equate in knee-jerk fashion with "the Devil," "Hell" and eternal damnation.

  • News Flash: We already live in a quasi-Socialist society, and have throughout our lives. Think Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, the public school system, unemployment benefits ... all of which have been under egregious attack by certain elements over the past few decades. But ... which of these things do you really think we can and should live without? Are you truly ready to see more people living under bridges and in tent cities, and children and adults starving in the streets? I know there are a few of you who say we can do without all these safety nets ... and I am happy if you feel you can personally get along without them (in which case, don't use them) ... but I'll wager that most of us (and our families) have benefited from these things, and will continue to benefit in the future. And you might take some pause to consider that your comfortable circumstances may be based as much on luck and circumstance as on your own abilities and "true grit." I recommend a book called Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, as well as the book Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich, both of which may give you some food for thought on this subject.

Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson, Liberal
Third President of the United States
Principal Author of the U.S. Declaration of Independence
Portrait by Charles Willson Peale (1791)


IMHO ... Socialism and Capitalism, like many philosophies, are unworkable in their "pure" forms ... partially because they do not take human nature and the "real world" into account. Our current economic debacle (which has been long in coming and did not arrive with President Obama) is a perfect example of laissez faire capitalism run amok. I will even go out on a limb here to posit that the ideal form of government may be a judicious blend of Socialism and Capitalism. Although I do not practice the Christian faith, nor believe many of its tenets, I do believe there is wisdom in some Christian thought ... and I am sure that many of you profess Christianity. I think from my earlier upbringing and understanding of his work that Jesus Christ would highly favor certain aspects of Socialism.... Feed the hungry, house the homeless, minister to the sick ... blessed are the poor, the meek, the merciful, the peacemakers.... I don't seem to recall Jesus (or his original disciples) saying anything about his followers going out and accumulating lots of property and wealth, and leaving their neighbors to twist in the wind. To the contrary, something comes to mind about camels and eyes of needles.... And the bedrock Ten Commandments of Judeo/Christian ethos warn strictly against bearing false witness. But I digress....

Despite assertions by parochial (and I don't mean Catholic) interests, the universal health care systems of Canada, Great Britain, France and other enlightened countries are models which we should study and emulate. The people who receive universal health benefits there (especially preventive care, which is so important to leading a healthy and hopefully longer and better life) would not consider for a moment changing their health care system for ours ... no matter how often opponents of universal health care try to claim this. It is ipso facto a lie. (I am sure a few people disgruntled with their health care systems can be found in those countries, but I speak here of the majority.) It is well past time for us to catch up with the other leading industrialized nations on this, which became more and more apparent to me as Yahn's recent medical bills climbed past $150,000.00 (to match the $150,000.00 plus the removal of my kidney in 2004 cost) ... or medical treatment will indeed soon be the sole province of the very wealthy.

One of the bĂȘtes noires of the lunatic fringe is the proposal to put all medical records into electronic form. There has been all sorts of heavy breathing about "millions of people" possibly having access to your personal records, even information concerning whether you've had a drinking problem or an abortion, etc. Take a deep breath and understand that under a system of electronic medical records, few if any more people would have access to your records than do now to your written, paper records. Believe me ... if you find yourself in a medical crisis with a doctor you've never seen in a hospital you've never visited ... you may be exuberantly grateful (not to mention alive!) if they have immediate access to your electronic medical records and thereby some clue as to your medical history, medications, and how to administer the most efficacious treatment as expediently as possible. You do not want to be dependent on the Pony Express ... or U.S. Mule ... to get those records to them. Converting medical records to an electronic system will also create jobs ... which are sorely needed. We live in the 21st Century ... not the 19th, nor even the 20th. I personally don't want to go back to the 1950s, no matter how nostalgically I sometimes look at those days ... and I suspect most of us don't want to either.

Another hysterical contention of recent e-mail(s) has been that if we adopt a more inclusive (not to say the dreaded universal) health care system, we may not be able to get the treatment we need (or want ... and there is a difference) and that medical care will be rationed. Well, guess what??? We are already in that situation ... if you don't have money or health insurance (and millions of our fellow citizens don't, and couldn't afford it if it was available to them) ... medical care and treatment are rationed to that segment of the population which has money and/or coverage ... those excluded are left to fend for themselves ... and no, a visit to the Emergency Room is not adequate, and ultimately costs us more to treat those without insurance than it would have if they had access to free preventive and other medical care.

As for a doctor or hospital determining what treatment you need as opposed to treatment you may want ... again, that's already the norm. But for purposes of this post, let's consider a heart transplant. There are a finite number of hearts available for transplant. Perhaps one day a truly viable artificial heart will be invented, and can be mass-produced.... BUT: Given the current state of medical technology, I don't believe that someone who is 65 or 70 or older should have the same right and access to an available heart as does a 35-45 year old who has a family. Sorry if that seems cold ... and yes, 65 and 70 look younger to me every day ... but it just makes sense not to waste a heart on someone who arguably only has a few years of life left anyway ... and may have or develop Alzheimer's or other debilitating conditions which will cut the elder-life short. Americans have got to get over the idea that we are going to live forever if someone just discovers the appropriate pill, surgery or nostrum. And it makes absolutely no sense to prolong life irrationally and unreasonably ... to the point where those whose lives have been prolonged lose control of their faculties and their bodies.

Under universal health care, if you need a knee or hip replacement, or other standard treatment, it will likely be available to you ... as it is in the advanced countries mentioned herein.




Thomas Paine, Liberal
"The Father of the American Revolution"
Painting by Auguste Milliere (1880)


But ... back to e-mails, briefly. I am chagrined, and incredulous, to report that there are still people out there who persist in circulating the discredited notion that President Obama is somehow not eligible to be our Commander in Chief because of specious and suspect allegations about his birth. There are those who cling to and propagate this untruth because (for whatever reason ... racial, political or otherwise) they simply cannot and will not concede Obama's victory last November and his right to represent the Executive Branch of our government. These people need to get over it ... get a non-biased book, magazine or newspaper ... get a life, and move on. They are wrong. WRONG ... period.... The matter has been thoroughly examined and adjudicated and found to have no merit. Obama was born in the State of Hawaii ... therefore is a U.S. citizen ... therefore is qualified under our Constitution to hold his office. This, and all the other Obama "hate mail" ... including the one that he is really a Muslim; the one that he is like Hitler; the awful smear using the insane theories and "conclusions" of a gadfly wannabe doctor (with suspect credentials) named Sam Vaknin, which I won't dignify here by repeating; and the aforementioned e-mails ... should be filed in the "circular" file ... and then DUMP the TRASH.

I leave you with a few random thoughts which touch on other e-mails I have received, and about which I will likely hear more ... unless I can convince people to stop sending me such things:
  • It has always struck me as exceedingly strange that some of the most fervent and vocal supporters of the death penalty also seek to outlaw abortion because of the "sanctity" of human life. It is worth noting that in the past several years, numerous people have been freed from death row, or from life (or at least very long) prison sentences because new and improved DNA techniques proved that they were innocent. It is well known that eye-witness, even victim, testimony may be inaccurate.
  • In a CNN poll this week, 80% of Americans support embryonic stem cell research. We have lost ground in this promising area over the past eight years due to the intransigence of a fanatical 20%, and again, it is time to join the 21st Century in an effort to make life better for those who live ... not for non-sentient entities which are going to be discarded anyway. I am proud that President Obama rectified this matter this past week.
  • Conservative writer David Frum (a former speechwriter for George W. Bush, and author of a cover story in a recent Newsweek magazine that explains "Why Rush is Wrong") noted Sunday in an appearance on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS that a new poll shows that for the majority of Americans, Rush Limbaugh is less popular than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
One final point: When I asked the person who passed along the "Tiger" e-mail (and has sent others) why he kept sending such things ... he huffily replied that he considered himself "neutral" as far as his politics (though he went on to say that he is a member of one particular political party) and that if I didn't like the e-mails I could simply delete them. Well, sorry about that. If he ... or anyone ... invades my "home" (including my Inbox) with such tripe, then I am entitled to counter with my thoughts on ... and the facts of ... the matter. I also answered that he could not claim "neutrality" when he kept circulating such dangerous lies. I personally have been called a great variety of colorful names, many of them beginning with the pejoratives "un-American," "Commie," "pinko" (in singular and combined usage) and including "baby-killer with blood on [my] hands," and rhymes with "witch" ... when I've dared to question the premises and facts of such e-mails.

To my mind, leaving such ideas unchallenged and without contradiction has allowed them to fester and grow, and has divided our country in many ways. These things need to and must be challenged and exposed for the frauds they represent. Never again should we fail or fear to speak when the Emperor (or anyone else) has no clothes ... but we must speak the truth ... not smears and lies. And I intend to do my part in the debunking of these idiocies ... not just passively and meekly hitting "delete." I have known for some time that I am probably NOT one of the people who is destined to inherit the earth according to Blblical teachings ... grin....

Succinctly, you have the right to your own beliefs and ideas. You have the right to disagree with our government (as I did frequently and vehemently during the Bush years) ... and with me ... although optimally your disagreement will be based on reasoned, rational thought with at least a dose of reality ... and not on wild-eyed hysteria of questionable veracity. You do NOT have the right to poison the community well or yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater ... or otherwise disseminate poisonous material. So....

Caveat sender to anyone who forwards such things along to me....

)O(

My Photo

9 comments:

  1. Just finished reading your latest... Tiger, to me, is a great role model and is the greatest golfer to ever play the game....I appreciate him even more for keeping his opinions to himself even though he would have tremendous influence on any issue....he did the military proud by his brief statements.

    Since I was and am an Obama supporter (yellow-dog Democrat) my mail box is filled with hate mail from the so called "right"...I generally just delete them so as not to get into an argument.... I have found you can't convince them of any fact since Snopes.com and TruthorFiction.com are run by the Democrats ... ha ... though like you I sometimes get so worked up by their "hogwash" that I have to respond and then it "hits the fan".....grin.... Another email that upsets me is the gun debate....I own 63 guns and not one of them is an assault weapon.... I am all for taking them off the market and out of the hands of the "bad guys". I haven't hunted in over 15 years but I collect them as a hobby and no one is going to take them away from me....I shoot snakes and bobcats and as old as I am just dare someone try to harm me or my family....

    We had a will made out a few years ago after I bought a farm that had been passed on to the couple's daughter....she passed away leaving it to her husband who then remarried a woman who had kids....he passed away leaving the farm to his new wife and she in turn left it to her kids leaving the original 2 children out in the cold. We have made sure all our estate will go to our kids that can use it for their lifetimes (but can't sell the land) and then it goes to our only grandson to do as he wishes.....as you say, when money is involved greed takes over......

    Keep blogging and I'll keep reading.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Darrell, I thank you for and very much appreciate your comments. And we are so in agreement about the gun issue. One of the latest disingenuous e-mails making the rounds now (trying to get people worked up) is HR 45. The "author" of this screed is telling recipients that if someone buys a gun under its provisions, the purchaser must agree to submit to a mental health examination at any time ... and that a purchaser must agree to let the government come in and inspect his premises anytime to make sure he is in compliance. Not true. A purchaser must sign a waiver whereby his mental health records may be obtained (which would have been a really good idea for the Virginia Tech killer), but there is no provision for further mental examination at the government's discretion. Also ... the "inspection" provision also applies to commercial facilities which manufacture, sell, distribute or otherwise traffic in guns.

    The whole thing is the proverbial "tempest in a teapot" because this bill has such little chance of passage that even the NRA is not "het-up" about it. Just another effort to scare and rile people....

    Since I have no intention of ceasing blogging, I am glad to know you will be reading. Thanks again....

    And a milestone: Nicki and I have noted that since we began the "Voices" blog on January 16, we have had in excess of 1600 "hits" on the blog ... and a good number from foreign countries. Those people came to us in roundabout, accidental ways; I doubt that they were "looking" for us ... but I like to think maybe they hung around and read a little bit. Perhaps someday one will comment....

    )O(

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jennifer,
    I too share a great deal of your frustration when it comes to receiving copious amounts of forwarded email. I so much prefer to have real emails from friends who are actually thinking of Me and who actually take the time to be personal. I long ago made a decision to just delete, delete, delete when they come my way.

    In my case, I truly believe that most of the politically oriented emails are designed to be inflammatory rather than informative. The only service they provide is to cause an epidemic of raised blood pressure, irrational fears, and misplaced anger. In other words they are a hazard to our health--mental and physical.

    It constantly amazes me that so many of us are willing to believe any and everything that comes into our email boxes (or televisions) particularly when they feed on the fears and frustrations held by people today. Why are we sometimes almost eager to have our worst fears confirmed so easily by words coming from someone we do not know, have never heard of, and who lacks credibility on any level? It would seem that being "right" or "left" at any cost comes with a very high price--anxiety, depression, irritability, and the loss of a sense of joy and beauty when we only see the "horror" in the world around us.

    I heard someone say not too long ago, that terrorist out there are probably sitting somewhere laughing as we Americans are hell bent on destroying ourselves. We seem to be our own worst enemies!!

    I am and will remain non-political. I love my president; I love my country; and I love my fellow Americans. We have tough times ahead of us. We can best serve one another by being thoughtful, informed, and open-minded. Our goals will never be achieved through hate filled email and endless debates driven by hate, fear, mis-information and name calling.

    When all else fails, take to heart the "Serenity Prayer"! In case you don't remember the words,

    God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
    the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

    After you repeat it about 50 times, just hit Delete, Delete, Delete.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What most people don't know is that HR 45 has been proposed the first day of Congress for the last 4 years.....it is sent to committee and never comes out since it violates the 2nd, 4th, 6th and probably the 12th amendment according to the Judicial Dept....why these e-mailing idiots keep bringing it up is beyond me.....I get at least 1/2 dozen emails a day concerning this and they basically are all the same....Dick Durbin said last week no gun legislation would come before the Senate this year, possibly next year the ban of assault weapons could come up.... All this attention is brought on by the gun ban in the District of Columbia by the Maryland Assembly which says you can't have guns in Washington D.C. That is what we need....everyone within 100 yards of the White House with a sniper rifle....you got me started.....grin...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Having said all of the above, I wanted to share one more thing

    I am grateful to those among us who have the words, knowledge, and zeal who care enough to fight for the truths (Jennifer)when some of us prefer to take a more passive stance (Me,(the deleter).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nicki, as always your points are well-taken and well-written. I agree with you completely that so many of these e-mails are obviously intended to be inflammatory ... and that is their danger. I had practiced hitting "Delete" without comment for a long time ... but finally came to the conclusion that they should be answered ... but that of course is my preference, and your solution works just fine and saves a lot of aggravation.

    I likewise join you in marveling why so many seem so willing ... in the absence of any proof ... to believe anything and everything that comes to their Inbox. And I could not agree more that these endless campaigns of misinformation and disinformation are destructive to us as a people.

    There are dangerous zealots out there, on both the left and the right ... and we would do well to avoid extremists of any persuasion.

    I have always thought the Serenity Prayer contains wonderful wisdom ... and I follow it ... particularly when it comes to (at least trying) to have the courage to change the things (like these e-mails) that (maybe) I can.... I certainly can't just accept them....

    Thanks as always for your always reasoned perspective.

    And Darrell, thanks to you for your additional (and cogent) comments on HR 45. We are pleased you have taken the time to share your thoughts, and to have you as a regular reader....

    )O(

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kudos to Jennifer's post and the ensuing comments. Nicki, thanks for your words-----all I can say is DITTO on all counts. I am a deleter and a firm Serenity Prayer reciter.
    And thanks to Jennifer for speaking up while I delete.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Clara, I am so touched by your words, and Nicki's.... Those who know me well know that I have been literally haunted by the Holocaust for most of this life ... indeed, possibly all of it ... and know the reasons why I say that.

    In any event, it is a very close, personal subject for me ... and I have thought since I was in high school that things might ... MIGHT, but no guarantee, although one must hope ... have been different for those who were persecuted by the Nazis if only a few more Germans of conscience had spoken out before the Nazis became entrenched. Unfortunately, too many were persuaded by the inflammatory rhetoric of Hitler and his henchmen. The (relatively) few Germans who did speak out also found themselves in concentration camps, and some were killed, for daring to speak.

    I believe it is important to speak out against lies and propaganda, before prejudices may become more entrenched than they already are. I've believed that since I was a teenager, and I've tried to do so ... particularly in the past several years. It is not always comfortable ... but it is something I feel I must do.

    Edmund Burke said: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

    And my "old friend," the German Lutheran Rev. Martin Niemoller, who was interned in Sachsenhausen and Dachau concentration camps, put it so well when he said:

    "When the Nazis came for the communists,
    I remained silent;
    I was not a communist.

    "When they locked up the social democrats,
    I remained silent;
    I was not a social democrat.

    "When they came for the trade unionists,
    I did not speak out;
    I was not a trade unionist.

    "When they came for the Jews,
    I remained silent;
    I was not a Jew.

    When they came for me,
    there was no one left to speak out."

    Thank you both again for your support....

    )O(

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would usually try to use humor to make my points, a habit I had to adopt during my twenty plus years of teaching among the "politically correct", but in reality, I am MUCH LESS tolerant than Jennifer is of rebel rousing propaganda of almost any color. At one time I was a zealous devotee of Ayn Rand's Objectivism. At one time I was a "Reagan Democrat". At one time I believed that Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny were real and that "trickle down economics" would actually benefit me someday. I have since realized my errors and have moved on to what I think is a more enlightened set of ideas. But may the gods save me from ideologues of any stripe.

    My response to some of the usually "forwarded" e-mails that Jennifer receives would be to make one request to the "forwarder" to delete me from their offensive mailing list, then block them from further communications. If they cannot respect my desire not to assaulted in my home by blatant lies and political-social propaganda then we don't need to be in communication. But that's just me. I have discovered, at the cost of several friendships, that I am not permitted to disagree with most social or political ideologues and that usually the price of my maintaining those friendships would have been my silence whenever these people decided to make their political/social/racial pronouncements. Can't do it. If this means that I am intolerant, then I'll take that wrong-headed title along with "Bleeding Heart Liberal", UnAmerican Commie Pinko... oh, you know the list. But then again, that's just me.

    ReplyDelete